What
is a void pointer?
Void pointer is a special type of
pointer which can reference or point to any data type. This is why it is also called as Generic
Pointer.
As a void pointer can point to
any data type, neither it is possible to dereference a void pointer, nor is it
possible to do any arithmetic operations on void pointer. Hence an explicit
type casting is absolutely must for using a void pointer.
The
best use of void pointer can be exhibited in the case of malloc and calloc.
This is discussed in details in this post.
What
is a null pointer?
A null pointer is also a special
type of pointer which points definitively to nothing.
As per official C language description,
every valid type of pointer has a special value called “Null Pointer” and this
value is always distinguishable from all other pointer values and it is guaranteed
to compare unequal to a pointer of any object or function.
Hold
it for a second! So what you are saying is there are different versions of null pointers for
every pointer type. Is it so?
No. We cannot call it as a “different
versions” rather their internal values are different. But as a programmer, we
need not to worry about it because compilers take care of and track the
internal values (may be differently depending on the compiler types)
So
why don’t you say that a null pointer is a pointer which is not initialized
yet?
I cannot go with this idea
because an uninitialized pointer may point to any thing. There might be an
uninitialized char pointer, an uninitialized int pointer and so on. But a null
pointer is definitely something which is there not to point anything.
Ok.
Now tell me what is a dangling pointer?
Dangling pointers are the
pointers which point to already de allocated or de referenced memory locations.
Suppose I write a piece of code like this
int*p;
p = (int*)malloc(n*sizeof(int);
----
----
free(p);
In this piece of code, after
allocating some memory to p, we are de allocating the memory which was
initially pointed by p. Hence now onwards, p acts as dangling pointer.
How
to rectify this?
In this case, after de allocation
that is after using free() we should set the pointer p to null as p = NULL
Could
you please exhibit any other source of dangling pointer problems?
Well, there might be other
sources also, like
Suppose I have declared
int*p, and within a specific scope, I have defined another integer x as 10; and
then within that specific scope I am making the pointer p to hold the base
address of x. Now outside this specific scope the p will act as a dangling
pointer. I can write the code as
void foo (void)
{
int
*p;
{
{
int x = 10;
p = &x;
}
//
here p will act as dangling pointer
}
}
Another case
might occur when from a function, we return an address of any variable and a corresponding
pointer in the receiver section receives it, then the receiving pointer might
get into dangling pointer problem, as just after the returning, as the variable
has passed it scope, the memory stack (where the variable is stored currently) might
be refreshed. But this phenomenon is not obvious, this might happen.
Fine, so how to deal with this second case?
To deal with
this, to be in safer side, we must have the scope of the variable intact out of
the function call; declaring it as static might be an option.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete